115-year journey of 36851
(Stop video before closing screen) Close animation
Certain aspects of these small batch of M1904/06 German Navy commercial holster rigs, including serial number 36851 are discussed at length below, first in the ⴕGörtz/Sturgess 2010 publication Pistole Parabellumon pages 376 and 377 and later in 2011 – 2012 in The Borchardt & Luger Automatic Pistols publication a.k.a. TBLAP by ⴕGörtz/Sturgess, Volume II, Chapter 13, pages 892, 893, 894.
2008
Below are Luger Forum comments posted from June 5, 2008 through August 21, 2008 with an included one-page data sheet titled: “DATA ON 1906 NAVY COMMERCIAL LUGERS AND SHOULDER STOCKS FOUND IN URUGUAY AS OF 17 DECEMBER 1974” followed by current 2023 LOB interpretations of excerpts of the Luger Forum comments and interpretations of specific serial numbers listed on the one-page data sheet. Strangely, as of 2023, 15 years since the 2008 Luger Forums publication of the subject 1974 data sheet there has been no other documented publication, except possibly NAPCA which is not available for this article, of the information contained in the subject data sheet.
2008 Luger Forum Comments
DWM Comm. Navy #36786 (Uruguay)
#1 · June 5, 2008 Luger Forum comments
In the old Forum Eric (Cirelaw) started a thread on a Navy stock he recently purchased. It showed out to be a stock that was delivered by DWM to Uruguay.
According to Dwight Gruber's Commercial Data Listing DWM might have delivered the Uruguayan Navies between 1906 and 1908.
2023LOB comments: a 1910 delivery for five-digit commercial navy Lugers seems more probable and not to the Uruguayan navy directly, if at all.
#5 · Jun 5, 2008
Vern
Most of the 1906 commercial reports (all variations) include the GESICHERT stamp in the lower portion of the thumb safety from at least sn 25184 to at least sn 26740, followed by all reports of polished thumb safeties. Joop's sn 36786 is joined by another Uruguayan export Navy Commercial sn 36851 with the GESICHERT stamp, by far the highest reported examples with this characteristic. I estimate that the Uruguayan export Navy commercials were manufactured in 1908. When considering the dates of 1906 and 1908 frame production, it is useful to remember that the P-08 variation was not finalized, and the DWM P08 contract assigned, until December 1908; so it is unlikely that any but the very earliest P08-style guns--military or commercial--were made before 1909. The GESICHERT stamped 1906 frames again beg the question of DWM commercial guns being assembled partially from rejected military parts or military overproduction, a topic which becomes very pertinent during WWI.
Regarding the five-digit serial number commercial Long Frame BUG proofed Navy Lugers, manufactured well into pre-WW1 New Model Short Frame production. These were, albeit very few and of nonconsecutive serial number ranges, produced in small batches over several years by DWM prior to WW1, outside and separate from the Navy military contract, were for the European and world-wide domestic market of which included the Uruguayan cache of five-digit, mostly BUG proofed commercial Navy Lugers, purportedly being initially as delivered, complete matching rigs.
----------------- page 2 ---------------
The emphasis on the pre-WW1 domestic, actually German market for commercial Navy Lugers is that there are no published offerings of commercial navy Luger rigs with Germany export markings, excluding 1920s assembled exports of commercial Navy Lugers. Additionally, despite the American domestic offerings of the commercial P.04 Navy Lugers in the pre-WW1 era the German civilian population, which held the Kaiser’s or the Emperor’s Navy in high regard being an issue of national pride, of which, no doubt included a certain demand of the German shooting public for the new P.04 navy commercial Luger, as carbine rigs and/or separate holster belt-loop carry P.04 rigs.
First, great research, the data evidenced data of Navy Lugers found in Uruguay as of November 1974 compiled by Carl Scheid demonstrating lugers from #34027 to #37229 and an odd ball, #54049. Were there any additions or alterations in the last 30 years. Considering my addition, #36719 have any other surfaced since then??
The 2019 RIA auction description is inaccurate and incorrect when it states that the frame is …with the “old” style “short” frame. Stating, also inaccurately that “Obviously the DWM factory was using up the old, left over parts.” Actually, the frame used was of the “New Model 129 mm Short Frame” that superseded the 131 mm long “Old Frame”[2]. To use the 36836 stamped 129 mm short frame required shortening the 6-inch, 9mm Navy barrel required shortening of the threaded portion of the barrel in conjunction with a machining reduction of the barrel flange thickness in order to install and properly align the barrel and the receiver witness marks to the “short frame” receiver.
----------------- page 3 ---------------
This assembly was done probably due to a shortage of first contract navy long frames and not as RIA states to use up “Old” style “short” frames, which is actually a contradictory statement. Regarding the 36836 short frame as at least 1,382 “New Model Short Frame” Lugers were manufactured before 36836based on a New Model short frame Luger in the collection being serial number 35454.
Even though the original configured BUG proofed commercial “Long Frame” navy Luger was a slow seller in the Continental United States does not mean there was a lack of demand for this navy variation in the rest of the world, a prime example being the subject Uruguayan cache.
The final issue with all the discussion regarding 36836 BUG proofed commercial navy Luger and its second or alternate, mismatched 36731 numbered board stock, while described by J.D. Julia and Rock Island Auction as of Uruguayan provenance, cannot be automatically categorized as such based on it and its mismatched navy board stock, not being listed on the Carl Scheid 1974 list of identified Uruguayan Lugers, lest not to mention its non-conforming short frame with its, as described, “polished bright lower Thumb Safety area”.
Considering the serial number range in the 1974 Carl Scheid data base, using serial number 36439 as a starting point with 37229 at the upper end gives us a potential range of 780 five-digit serial numbers, which is a reasonable range for the purported 20 to 30 Uruguayan Navy Lugers. 780 divided by 30 give us approximately 1 in 26 possibilities for a Uruguayan Navy Luger. Since the lowest “new model” five-digit serial number manufactured in 1906 is 25001 it is reasonable to restrict the range to the circa 1908, 36000 block of serial numbers, where most of the commercial navy serial numbers are found.
Conversely, the Sturgess explanation for the Uruguayan commercial Navy Luger provenance or the “Uruguayan Connection” relies solely on the unsupportable contention by Sturgess that 20 – 30 commercial Navy Lugers, as stated above were imported though Broqua & Scholberg of Montevideo via Georg Frank of Hamburg circa 1910. That the statement is not supported by any source data, invoice or other information other than the classical retort “Reported”[3] is concerning, as certainly Sturgess didn’t create this Uruguayan scenario “out of whole cloth”.
In the 2010 publication Pistole Parabellum where Sturgess discusses in the paragraph titled: The Uruguayan Connection, the first sentence starts with the statement: Many of these commercial P.04s are “reported” to have been exported to Uruguay…whereas in the 2011-2012 publication The Borchardt & Luger Automatic Pistols in the section titled: The Commercial P.04 where in the second paragraph he discusses the Uruguayan commercial navy Lugers, the first sentence states: A number of these were exported to Uruguay. This subtle change in grammar suggests that from 2010 to 2011 - 2012 Sturgess had gone from reported to certain. Additionally, in TBLAP Sturgess now states categorically that: They were imported by the department store Broqua & Scholberg of Montevideo.
Regarding the 1974 Carl Scheid data base of M1906 Commercial Navy Lugers and Shoulder Stocks found in Uruguay as 12 December 1974, although accepted as genuine, the data base is not completely satisfactory in its Comments or description column. Some of the 1906 Navy Commercial Lugers on the lists are described in detail meaning they were personally examined and described in the Comments column, where others listed are not.
A spreadsheet was made replicating the original 1974 data with an added column identifying the dispersal or spread of the serial numbers. Additional 2023LOB comments were added to the original 1974 comments column for clarification. Pictured are the original 1974 data base and the 2023LOB modified data base for comparison.
[1] The exact route of 36851 from Europe to auction is unclear as although it was sold at auction in Maine in 2014, prior to auction it had to be export marked by Simpson LTD in Illinois who was the importer then returned to Maine for auction, ironically, purportedly bought by Simpson Ltd for yet another trip back to Illinois offered for resale on his web site.
[2] It should be noted that the Imperial German Navy Lugers continued to use the “Old Model Long Frame” from 1906 up to WW1 while the New Model Short Frame was introduced in 1906 by DWM and used exclusively with the Imperial Army P.08 contract and many commercial variants through 1914.
[3] Common talk or an account spread by common talk: RUMOR
[4] Other Sturgess firearms interests have included ownership of the UK based specialist arms auctioneer, Weller & Dufty Ltd from 1988, until forced into closure by the decline in the UK gun trade and collector market under ever increasing government restrictions in 2005.