Additional Police bayonet characteristics are the markings of which the full-length regulation bayonets, in addition to the maker and inspection marks are additionally identified to various police organizations vs. the Police dress bayonets of which, generally are not Police organization identified other than the maker marks. There are other nuances associated with Police bayonets, however, the above information is sufficient to discuss the comparable Kaiserliche Marine Seebataillon Officer Dress Daggers and Presentation bayonets.
Unser Kaiser Kaiserliche Marine Officer Dress Daggers or Dirks
The Kaiserliche Marine officer dress daggers or dirks are distinctly different from their later comparable Weimar era Police dress bayonets, specifically with their very fancy etched blades with ships and fouled anchors, which, unlike the later 1920s – 1930s Police dress bayonets, are not smaller versions of Kaiserliche Marine Presentation bayonets. These Imperial German Navy Officer Dress daggers were apparently important or symbolic to Germany, down to current times, as the firm of WKC SOLINGEN, an old time German sword manufacturing company, produced a unique Imperial German Navy Officer Dress Dagger to commemorate the 1990 reunification of Germany. EINIGHT – RECHT – FREIHEIT or UNITY – RIGHT – LIBERTY, in addition to standard commemorative offerings.
Featured are four extremely rare examples of the Seitengewhr 98 bayonets, three of the Kaiser’s navy and one of the Imperial German Army:
Kaiserl. I. Seebataillon,
Kaiserl. II. Seebataillon,
a unit marked Seitengewhr 98 leather scabbard and mismatched bayonet with added handle flashguard.
Imperial German Army Seitengewehr 98 Presentation Bayonet
The 1) and 2) examples are Seebataillon Imperial German Navy etched “Regulation New Pattern/Presentation” Seitengewhr 98 bayonets with original, mating leather scabbards.
The subject Seitengewhr 98 New Pattern Kaiserliche I. Seebataillon bayonet, circa 1902 – 1914 was awarded/presented to a sailor/soldier who either volunteered for one-year, as indicated in the inscription, or was possibly awarded or presented to after the first year of service of “one year” as a marine, presumably to serve in Africa or China, a time when Germany was desperate for naval infantry, certain to be thrown into immediate combat far from home. This featured Kaiserliche I. Seebataillon marked Seitengewehr 98 presentation bayonet, although being an extremely rare, 2-sided etched blade, unique presentation piece, is not a one-off example as one other has been identified being Einjährig-Freiwilliger Hoffman. For more history of the Kaiserliche Marine, Click Here.
3) Seitengewhr 98 bayonet with Added Flashguard and Kaiserliche Marine Unit marked scabbard
In order to better understand the subject Seitengewhr 98 with added flashguard, a brief history of the Seitengewhr 98/05 is presented.
The Seitengewehr 98/05 was introduced into the Prussian army in late 1905, as a replacement for the 98/02 for engineers and pioneer troops, as the 98/02 was deemed too long and heavy for its intended purpose. Initial production was in two versions, the first plain backed, and the second with 29 double teeth. The scabbard was leather with steel throat and chape mounts. The bayonet as typical of German blades did not have more than a vestigial muzzle ring, relying on the length of the hilt mounting to fix the blade to its rifle. The plain back version was identified as the S98/05 or S98/05 o.S. (ohne Säge - without saw) and the saw back as the S98/05 S or m.S. (mit Säge - with saw). About 6% of blades made
were fitted with the saw back.
At the beginning of WWI it was found that the S98/05 had a problem when used with the 1908 - 1918Karabiner 98 AZ rifle, the shorter barrel on this model led to burning and damage to the S98/05 grips as the barrel finished before the vestigial muzzle ring, so in 1915 it was decided to fit a steel flash guard (Schutzbleche) to the back of the bayonet to protect the grips. The bayonet was additionally modified by removing most of the muzzle ring remaining, reducing the back of the tang and adding the flash guard. This led to a change in designation of the bayonet to the S98/05 nA (for neuer Art - new type) for new production and a retroactive change to S98/05 aA (alter Art - old type). These still had the additional letters to indicate whether the blade was equipped with the Saw back or not S98/05 aA S and S98/05 nA S.
The bayonets didn't come with spare parts. Maybe the regimental gunsmiths had some spare wooden grip pieces, but if the bayonet was broken, they would get sent back to the manufacturer while the soldier was given a new one.
These were, a) not in service, so no soldier had to give back their weapon, b) or in good shape since they had not been used for a long time or at all. The (subject) bayonet and scabbard are mismatched. Despite the fact that the subject Seitengewhr 98 bayonet was property of the army, while the scabbard is a proper navy piece, nevertheless, represents a rare example of a Seitengewehr 98 bayonet modified during WW1.
Subsequently, it can be categorically stated that the subject Seitengewehr 98 army property marked New Pattern bayonet was not originally issued with the pictured Kaiserliche Marine unit marked scabbard, also with army crown acceptance stamps as cited above and that also, as stated above: it's not unusual so see these S98 bayonets without unit markings, {army or navy}. They were produced and then stored away in the arsenals. Additionally, even Kaiserliche Marine Seitengewhr 98 presentation bayonets with I. and II. Seebataillon etched blades, some with sailor’s names on blades and/or scabbards, lack unit markings.
The original T.A. 906. unit mark, based on the above cited information was applied prior to 1906 when the navy unit was renamed I. and II. T.D. and based on the W/06 blade property acceptance stamp the bayonet is mismatched to the KM unit marked scabbard, however, to further confuse matters the W/06 property stamp is not the manufacture date of the bayonet, but the year it became the Kaiser’s property or inventory.
Although, it's not that uncommon to find Seitengewhr 98 New Pattern bayonets with flashguards added in Germany, no published examples have been observed until now. They are rare and this one is a Prussian, which makes it even rarer, since most Seitengewhr 98 New Pattern bayonets are Saxon or Bavarian. For more interesting information on the Seitengewhr 98 and the Kaiserliche Marine, click here.
Unser Kaiser 4) Imperial German Army Seitengewehr 98 Presentation Bayonet
The subject featured Kaiserliche Marine presentation Seitengewhr 98 bayonets are not restricted to the Kaiser’s navy as pictured is a fine Imperial German Army example of a Seitengewhr 98 presentation bayonet, leather scabbard and hanger with a full length, two-side etched blade described by the seller as:
It is interesting to note that although thisImperial German Army S98 Presentation bayonet does not have an external W/xx inventory date on the blade or Crown/D acceptance stamps on the pommel or leather scabbard locket and chape, although interestingly the inside surface of each wooden grip has a Crown/D acceptance stamp.
A Unique Seitengewhr 98 New Pattern Bayonet
The reasons often cited for the introduction or manufacture of the Seitengewhr 98/05, introduced into the Prussian army in late 1905, as a replacement for the Seitengewhr 98 bayonet is that it was deemed too long and heavy for its intended purpose. Additionally, because of the 20½-inch extra-long length, thin width and subsequent, frail quality of the blade, it tended to bend, distort or was subject to breakage. This was the result, mostly of the rather small, maximum 6.5 mm typical width of the blade, as measured at the crosspiece.
Even this 27.6 percent increased blade thickness or width change alone, although significant, if present on all Seitengewhr 98 manufactured bayonets would not have prevented its eventual replacement, subsequently production was discontinued in September 1914. The weapon was then withdrawn from service and either landed in depots or was issued to rear area units.
Another interesting aspect of the WK & C bayonet maker is the makers mark located on the Ricasso of the blade, which according to sources: Weyersberg and Kirschbaum were an amalgamation of the well known Weyersberg family and W R Kirschbaum. It is believed that Weyersberg bought Kirschbaum & Co around 1883 and the firm became Weyersberg, Kirschbaum & Cie. If this is the maker marking you are asking about it is a narrow window from circa 1883 to 1900. The newly named firm then combined the knights head logo of Kirschbaum with the kings head logo of Weyersberg and styled themselves as WK&C, who then evolved into WuK (Weyersburg und Kirschbaum) and finally into WKC with the single knights head logo.
Per one noted bayonet dealer the purpose for the small rectangular holes in the wooden grips of the S98 handle, close to the cross guard are for oiling the press stud and internal spring at the end of the pommel.Oil, when added to these holes would run along the inside of the metal tang of the handle and inside the grips to get to the spring to keep it lubricated. These holes did a better job of lubing the internal spring than just adding oil to the press stud and release catch on the end of the handle.
However, since the locking assembly or spring-loaded press stud and release catch is completely encased in the Pommel, with no lubricating access except through the press stud-and-release catch on the end of the handle, another explanation is needed.
An alternate and more plausible explanation is presented for the hole found in the hilt or pommel of bayonets, placed to allow the end of the hole in the pommel into which the Gewehr 98 (rifle) “cleaning rod” slid, allowing it, the attachment channel slot to be cleared of debris etc. or to clean the exposed end of the attachment channel stud slot of the lock that would have prevented the bayonet locking onto the rifle, often mistakenly called an “Oil” Hole.
Other bayonet collector comments: As for the two rectangular shaped holes in the wooden handles, next to the cross guard, they are not ‘Oil Holes’ but possibly ‘Breather of Equalizer holes’, in conjunction with the inside channels in the wood handles, to provide relief for when the rifle cleaning rod is inserted for clearing debris is to displace air. When inserting a small diameter rod in the hole in the pommel, it extends to the two rectangular shaped holes in the wooden handles.
Other bayonet collector comments: Dress bayonets were produced to look a lot like the regulation pattern bayonet, but they didn’t have to be an exact copy and this could be the explanation why the holes were missing. The brass plug could be installed to close the bayonet handle so no rain could get into the handle. A possible reason for the two (wooden handle) holes was that water could escape and not stay inside the handle and if these holes were not present it is reasonable to close off the handle with a plug.
Regarding the above comments the two featured S98 New Pattern Kaiserliche Marine Seebataillon bayonets I and II, a.k.a. KMI and KMII handle assemblies are identical in size, except for the later shortened blade of KMII, so the explanation of why the KMII two wooden handles lack holes lies elsewhere. For the above water explanation to functionally work is only if/while the bayonet is in the leather scabbard, with the leather frog scabbard carrier affixed to the sailors/soldier’s belt.
Only with the bayonet and scabbard in a vertical orientation will the holes in the “lower” end of the left and right side attached wooden handles function as drain holes, with the hole in the pommel act as the entrance of water. This creates a situation of the outer facing hole in the wooden handle open, i.e. unimpeded to draining water while the inner side wooden handle drain hole being effectively blocked by resting in contact with the leather frog surface. Interestingly, in some depictions describing the components of the bayonet, the small, rectangular holes in the wooden handles are described as Clean-Out
holes.
The Seitengewhr 1898 Old and New Pattern bayonet series, made by several period German Sword makers for the Imperial Navy and Army, was the only bayonet with one or two-piece wooden handles with these unique “Drain Holes” apparently considered ineffective as later examples, such as Police bayonets, manufactured with completely sealed handles with the wooden handles being replaced with Stag horn, relatively impervious to water damage.
Additionally, of the five Seitengewhr 98 bayonet examples in the collection regarding the handle assembly: 1) wooden grip drain holes, 2) corresponding inside grip channels and, 3) drilled hole in the pommel bayonet attaching channel. Only one of the four examples share all of the described share or exhibit one of the three features, being item 2) inside wooden grip channels. One example with the small rectangular drain holes in the wooden grips, there is no corresponding hole drilled in the pommel, which normally extends, via a channel or groove in the inside surface of the wooden grips, extending to the two rectangular shaped holes in the wooden handles, making the wooden handle drain holes non-functional. These inconsistent features or the lack thereof in the four examples examined make it impossible to come to any rational conclusions regarding to purpose of these features.
However, although Imperial Navy marked M1898 “presentation” bayonets are authentic, no pictures have ever been identified showing German Marine “troops”, posing with the M1898, New Pattern bayonet. This may be only because of the rarity of the variation, being a M1898 “Presentation” navy bayonet carried, possibly by officers only, that no pictures exist, despite one being pictured in the Wittmann book on page 91 with a leather hanger or frog.
---------------- page 8 ---------------
History of the Kaiserliche Marine
The first Seebataillon was organized in May 1852 as the Royal Prussian Marnier-Korps at Stettin. This formation performed light duty such as protecting officers, general policing aboard warships and limited amphibious shore intrusions. The Seebataillon in 1870 had a strength of 22 officers and 680 non-commissioned officers and men. Battalion headquarters was then located at Kiel.
After the establishment of the German Empire in 1871, Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, more or less, ignored the navy as it did “not fit his intentions.” Bismarck’s continental policies sought to avoid colonial or naval entanglements and he would oppose plans to further develop navy forces.
With the creation of the Imperial Admiralty, Prussian army Generalleutnant Albrecht von Stosch was appointed chief. Stosch had no experience in naval matters, but “nevertheless, brought significant administrative talents to his new post.” He also perceived military power to emanate “from the tip of an army bayonet.” Stosch ended the practice of placing marines aboard warships. Instead he adopted a concept that became known as Infanterieismus. He would train seamen as naval infantry, qualified in using small arms and competent in infantry tactics and amphibious operations.
That approach would position the Seebataillon as a compact, self-contained organization, roughly equivalent to the British Royal Marine Light Infantry. Scheduled exchanges of officers from the Prussian army brought current tactical thinking to the sea battalions. The successful occupation of Kiautschou in China in November 1897 by the navy’s East Asia Cruiser Division was a flawless demonstration of Infanterieismus (Infantryism).
Since the mid-1880s Seebataillon troops were frequently used as temporary intervention forces, mostly in the colonies. A company was sent in 1884 toGerman Kamerun. During the Boxer rebellion in China from 1900 to 1901, the first and second Seebataillon, reinforced by an engineer company and field artillery battery, comprised the German contingent to the international relief force. In 1904–1908 during theHerero and Nama revolt, a formation in battalion strength supported the Schutztruppe in German South West Africa; during 1905–1906 a Seebataillon detachment served in German East Africa during theMaji Majiuprising.
Pictured is a short WW1 movie showing the beginning of the war where Imperial German soldiers, while being issued supplies, were examining their Seitengewhr
98 bayonets.
The second type in this example has a scabbard tip which has been eaten away by corrosion along the top edge.
The first type was produced till 1902, but breakages to the wooden grip occured. The new model was more practical. However, it had disadvantages in field service due to breakages of the long blade, production ceased by mid September 1914, and it was replaced by other types. The weapon was then withdrawn from service and either landed in depots or was issued to rear area units. On this second example the wooden grips have considerably darkened due to bad storage, corrosion staining the wood.
When I see a Weyersberg king's head logo stamped by itself on the ricasso of a sword, I assume it predates the 1883 merger with Kirschbaum. I used to think the same applied to the Kirschbaum knight's head logo, but then I began to notice a number of what appeared to be post-1883 swords, some also stamped "Germany", which were stamped with a lone knight's head logo. I have little to no knowledge of German makers and the evolution of their logos. Do any of our members know if WKC continued to use the sole Knight's head logo after the merger, and if so, when and why? Did it also continue to use a sole king's head? When and for what purpose?
I am not sure, but suspect it was a way to identify a finished blade...perhaps they had some mix-ups earlier? The people running WK&C today have very little information, and they have even contacted me for history and such!!
Weyersberg Kirschbaum & Cie was the amalgamation of two very old Solingen family companies in 1883. Both companies had had their own trademark. For Weyersburg it was King's head and for Kirschbaum it was a Knight's head. On amalgamation the two trademarks were merged and appeared on the ricasso of blades from 1883 until 1918 and the end of the monarchy in Germany.